Chief architect vs softplan mac#

We are not working on a Native Mac version and likely never will.ДЈ. We would not recommend the iMac that you mention or any Mac computer.Дў. I had a strong recommendation toward SP from a developer friend and his truss maker also uses SP, but I am a Mac user and although the FAQs state that SP can be used on a Mac, the SP sales people say not, here is a quote from the last email I received,ДЎ. I hope more SP users who have used CA will add to this thread as I am trying to decide between the two. So, all in all while the jury is still out for me on Softplan, knowing what I like and do not like about Chief, I thought it was time to look into a change. My version of Chief is V10, and after seeing many of the issues I have in V10 being complained about in the Chieftalk User Forum for X9, I thought there had to be a better way, and I sure hope that is Softplan. Things like plumbing drops or fixture locations need to be refigured manually with Chief, as they will not appear from floor to floor. You can then change wall types if it is a foundation, and remove the unused portions of the original floor plan. In SoftPlan it appears the first floor is copied to either a foundation level or second floor, and all of the walls and other components are copies along with it.

One thing I liked about SoftPlan is how you create different floors. I certainly hope this is not the case with SoftPlan, but since I am an brand new user, only time will tell. As I have a lot of plans over the years that are based on previous drawings, this is a real time consuming issue. You can save it as a different plan name, you can save it on a different location in our computer, but if you ever lose House 1, or if the file ever gets corrupted you are out of luck and have to recreate the entire drawing for House 2.

Chief architect vs softplan archive#

I really do not know if SoftPlan has the same issue, but with Chief if you want to alter an existing plan (say 'House1') then save it as 'House 2' for a different client, or just an alternative design for the same client, you must save House 1 forever, you cannot archive it, you cannot save it on a separate hard drive, it must remain active in your system for as long as you want to use House 2. While I do find it (Chief) fairly easy to use, it has, in my opinion, about the worst file management system ever invented by man. Like any program it has its good and not so good points. I am just getting started with SoftPlan and have used Chief for many, many, many years. I've even used it for a variety of engineering and tool and die design projects, steel detailing and so many things, building race cars as part of my number of business ventures, it even works for me in designing and making various parts.

Chief architect vs softplan how to#

I have also taught more than a dozen others over the years, guys/gals that worked with and for me, how to use SP, and once they learned it, they too question why anyone would want to use other programs. I've spent hours and hours watching videos, I am that committed. I also have Illustrator and Photoshop, but rarely use them either, SP has such fantastic 3-D capabilities, even I am still learning them and getting better and better.

Chief architect vs softplan full#

I have the full 2016 AutoCAD Architecture suite, BIM and all, but I normally use it to convert files and once in a great while, if I can't find what I want in a online 3-D site, I might make something. I know that these other programs likely have their place, but with all you can currently do with SP, they just take up hard drive space for me. I did try Chief, Sketch up and various others, but after a day or so of attempting to even begin to learn it as fast as I did SP, I knew I had the right stuff. Having self taught me, around about a version 4 of SoftPlan, once I started using it, finally went to a class, and continued with updates, I never looked back. It was fun to learn and with a lot of time and effort, you could produce a decent set of prints, but a LOT OF TIME, and you (yourself personally) had to be very accurate, or you had just another average drafted plan set.

I started with AutoCAD back in the 80's, version 1.4. (no dimensions, only names and size notes) It did look kinda cool, a little sketched looking with line intersects extending slightly past the corners as in the old fashioned drafting way. I know many Architects that seem to use a mix of several design programs, to this day, I've no clue why, except one did seem to like the plan presentation in a simple version. I have to say, I am with Sam on this one.